![]() ![]() It argued that the First Amendment and "common law rights of access" to court docs provided the necessary legal authority. "Whether and how the government can compel internet communications platforms to modify their technology to enable surveillance against their users is a topic of vigorous public debate," the civil rights advocacy group argued in its filing. Those files almost certainly include the legal arguments put forward by the US government to compel a private third-party to intercept and, if need be, decrypt private chatter.Īs such, the ACLU argued, there is a clear public interest in what the US government's arguments. Soon after this legal tussle emerged, the ACLU sued the DoJ in an effort to get the relevant documents made public.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |